<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: November fear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libraryriot.com/2008/09/04/november-fear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libraryriot.com/2008/09/04/november-fear/</link>
	<description>The revolution will not be blogged.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://libraryriot.com/2008/09/04/november-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libraryriot.com/?p=96#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Truly, politics is image. No doubt. But I think another smart way to critically evaluate the current candidates would be to observe which candidates are able to maintain the steadiest images and stances in the face of critique. Do you want your elected candidate to fight the good fight til the end unwavering, or to &quot;reevaluate&quot; the stances you elected him/her on at the first sign of a challenge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly, politics is image. No doubt. But I think another smart way to critically evaluate the current candidates would be to observe which candidates are able to maintain the steadiest images and stances in the face of critique. Do you want your elected candidate to fight the good fight til the end unwavering, or to &#8220;reevaluate&#8221; the stances you elected him/her on at the first sign of a challenge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
